Max Popenker (mpopenker) wrote,
Max Popenker
mpopenker

чертовски интересное - отчет из первых рук о FN SCAR

отчет об армейской версии, т.е. от реального бойца US SOCOM, если я правильно понимаю

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&f=2&t=280622&page=1

пара хайлайтов из довольно длиного поста:

Accuracy
We only used military issued, 62 grn for the MK16 and 147 grn for the MK17.
25 meters (prone, supported).
MK16, iron sights or eotech, groups were no larger than 1/4".
MK17, iron sights: 1/4", Elcan 4X: 1/8" (the rounds were usually through the same hole)
The scope of this initial test did not include shooting for groups on paper past 25M.
We did however engage pop-up targets out to 900M.

The accuracy of the rifle was very acceptable.

Some shooters routinely made hits @ 900M w/ the MK17 w/ 4X optic. I got lucky occasionally

Bottom Line:
The SCAR is a good system. I’m not ready to give up my M4.
As the SCAR evolves over the next couple years, it will be a top-of-the line rifle.
I’m not convinced that it is worth the cost to purchase and train on a completely new system.


выводы из подчеркнутого можете сделать сами.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 52 comments